Quarterback Rating Calculator
Quarterback Rating
NFL passer rating formula (0-158.3)
Statistics Summary
Completion %
N/A
Yards/Attempt
N/A
TD/INT Ratio
N/A
About Quarterback Rating Calculator
Understanding Quarterback Rating
The quarterback rating, also known as the passer rating or QB rating, stands as one of the most comprehensive statistical measures in American football, providing a standardized method to evaluate quarterback performance. Introduced by the National Football League (NFL) in 1973, this complex formula synthesizes four critical passing statistics—completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdown rate, and interception rate—into a single numerical value ranging from 0 to 158.3.
Unlike basic statistics such as passing yards or touchdowns, the quarterback rating offers a holistic perspective on a quarterback's efficiency, accuracy, and decision-making abilities. It rewards consistent completions, productive yardage gains, touchdown productivity, and careful ball security, while penalizing incompletions and interceptions. This calculator enables coaches, analysts, fantasy football enthusiasts, and fans to quickly compute accurate quarterback ratings based on game performance data.
As the quarterback position continues to evolve in modern football, with increased emphasis on passing efficiency and precision, understanding this metric becomes increasingly valuable for evaluating player performance, making personnel decisions, and appreciating the nuances of the game's most scrutinized position. Whether evaluating an individual game performance or analyzing career trajectories, the quarterback rating provides a standardized benchmark for comparing players across different teams, eras, and offensive systems.
Historical Development of Quarterback Rating
The quarterback rating system has a fascinating history that reflects football's evolution from a primarily running game to the pass-heavy sport we know today. In the early days of professional football, quarterback evaluation relied solely on subjective assessment and basic counting statistics like yards and touchdowns. As the passing game grew more sophisticated in the mid-20th century, the need for a more comprehensive metric became apparent.
In 1973, a committee led by Don Smith of the Pro Football Hall of Fame, in collaboration with NFL statistician Don Weiss and special committee member Seymour Siwoff, developed the modern passer rating formula. The goal was to create a standardized system that would accurately represent quarterback performance across multiple statistical categories. The NFL adopted this system officially that same year, fundamentally changing how quarterback play was evaluated.
The formula was deliberately designed with specific parameters: a perfect passer rating (158.3) requires completing at least 77.5% of passes, averaging at least 12.5 yards per attempt, throwing a touchdown on at least 11.875% of attempts, and having zero interceptions. These thresholds were considered exceptional performance benchmarks at the time of creation, though modern passing offenses have made achieving these numbers somewhat more common in individual games, if still quite rare over entire seasons.
Interestingly, the college football passing efficiency formula differs significantly from the NFL version, using different multipliers and resulting in a much higher scale where ratings frequently exceed 200 for elite quarterbacks. This distinction reflects the different contexts and performance expectations between collegiate and professional levels of play.
Evolution of QB Evaluation Timeline
| Era | Key Development |
|---|---|
| Pre-1970s | Basic stats like yards and TDs used |
| 1973 | NFL passer rating formula established |
| 2000s | Advanced metrics emerge to complement passer rating |
| 2011 | ESPN introduces Total QBR |
| 2010s-Present | Analytics era with multiple QB evaluation systems |
Perfect Passer Rating Games (Selected)
| Player | Date | Stats |
|---|---|---|
| Kurt Warner | 9/20/2009 | 24/26, 243 yards, 2 TDs |
| Tom Brady | 10/21/2007 | 21/25, 354 yards, 6 TDs |
| Lamar Jackson | 11/10/2019 | 15/17, 223 yards, 3 TDs |
| Deshaun Watson | 10/25/2020 | 17/22, 344 yards, 4 TDs |
The Quarterback Rating Formula
The NFL quarterback rating formula is a sophisticated calculation designed to incorporate multiple dimensions of passing performance into a single metric. Although it appears complex at first glance, understanding the formula's structure reveals how it balances different aspects of quarterback play to produce a comprehensive evaluation.
The formula transforms four key statistics—completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdown percentage, and interception percentage—into component scores, which are then combined into the final rating. Each component is adjusted to contribute equally to the final score, ensuring that no single aspect of passing performance dominates the metric.
Step-by-Step NFL Passer Rating Calculation
Step 1: Calculate the component values
a = ((Completions ÷ Attempts) × 100 - 30) ÷ 20
b = (Yards ÷ Attempts - 3) ÷ 4
c = (Touchdowns ÷ Attempts) × 20
d = 2.375 - ((Interceptions ÷ Attempts) × 25)
Step 2: Clamp each value between 0 and 2.375
a = Max(0, Min(2.375, a))
b = Max(0, Min(2.375, b))
c = Max(0, Min(2.375, c))
d = Max(0, Min(2.375, d))
Step 3: Compute the final rating
Passer Rating = ((a + b + c + d) ÷ 6) × 100
The formula's design includes several intentional features. First, each component has a maximum value of 2.375, which prevents extreme performance in one area from compensating for poor performance in others. Second, the formula produces values between 0 and 158.3, with 158.3 representing "perfect" passing performance. Third, a passer rating of approximately 66.7 represents the historical league average, though this benchmark has risen in recent years as passing offenses have become more efficient.
Component Thresholds for Perfect Rating:
- Completion rate of at least 77.5%
- Yards per attempt of at least 12.5
- Touchdown on at least 11.875% of attempts
- Zero interceptions
To achieve a perfect passer rating of 158.3, a quarterback must exceed specific thresholds in each component, making it an exceptionally high standard. The rating's mathematical structure demonstrates how it balances accuracy (completion percentage), productivity (yards per attempt), scoring efficiency (touchdown percentage), and ball security (interception percentage) into one comprehensive metric.
Interpreting Quarterback Rating Values
Understanding how to interpret quarterback rating values is essential for contextualizing this statistical measure. The scale ranges from 0 to 158.3, but where a particular rating falls within this spectrum requires proper perspective on league averages, historical benchmarks, and contemporary standards of quarterback play.
The quarterback rating scale has undergone significant inflation over NFL history. In the 1970s when the system was introduced, the league-wide passer rating hovered around 65. Today, the league average typically exceeds 85, reflecting modern rule changes favoring the passing game, improved quarterback development, and more sophisticated offensive schemes. This contextual evolution means that rating interpretation must consider the era in which a performance occurs.
Modern Quarterback Rating Scale
| Rating Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 110+ | Elite performance |
| 100-109.9 | Excellent performance |
| 85-99.9 | Good performance |
| 70-84.9 | Average performance |
| Below 70 | Below average performance |
Career Leaders (Min. 1,500 attempts)
| Quarterback | Career Rating | Years Active |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Mahomes | 105.7 | 2017-present |
| Deshaun Watson | 103.3 | 2017-present |
| Aaron Rodgers | 102.9 | 2005-present |
| Russell Wilson | 100.8 | 2012-present |
Season-long quarterback ratings provide a better indication of consistent performance than single-game ratings, which can fluctuate dramatically based on opponent quality, weather conditions, and game situations. A quarterback who maintains a rating above 100 throughout a season demonstrates exceptional consistency and efficiency, while ratings in the 85-99 range indicate solid starter-level performance in today's NFL.
When examining quarterback rating, it's useful to consider other contextual factors: team strength, offensive system, quality of receiving corps, offensive line performance, and strength of schedule all influence a quarterback's statistical outcomes. The most valuable interpretations combine quarterback rating with these contextual elements to form a complete performance evaluation.
Context for Interpretation:
- Single-game ratings vary more widely than season averages
- Modern rule changes have inflated ratings compared to historical averages
- Playoff game ratings tend to be lower due to elite competition
- Ratings against top defenses provide better performance indicators than against weaker ones
- Weather conditions (rain, snow, wind) typically reduce passer ratings
Limitations and Criticisms
Despite its widespread use, the quarterback rating system has several meaningful limitations that analysts, coaches, and fans should consider when evaluating quarterback performance. While valuable as a standardized metric, it offers an incomplete picture of a quarterback's total contribution to team success.
Perhaps the most significant limitation is that the formula only considers passing statistics, ignoring a quarterback's rushing contributions. In today's NFL, mobile quarterbacks like Lamar Jackson, Josh Allen, and Jalen Hurts generate substantial offensive value through their running ability, which quarterback rating completely overlooks. A quarterback could rush for 150 yards and two touchdowns in a game, yet these achievements would have zero impact on their passer rating.
Key Statistical Omissions
- Rushing yards and touchdowns
- Sacks taken (protection recognition)
- Fumbles (ball security)
- Game situation context
- Dropped passes by receivers
- Throwaways to avoid negative plays
- Quality of competition faced
Contextual Factors Not Considered
- Pass protection quality
- Receiver separation and drop rate
- Offensive system complexity
- Weather conditions
- Game script (leading vs. trailing)
- Defensive quality faced
- Pass difficulty (tight window throws)
The formula's treatment of yardage has also drawn criticism. All passing yards are treated equally, regardless of situation. A 3-yard completion on 3rd-and-2 that sustains a drive may be more valuable than a 15-yard completion on 3rd-and-20 that falls short of the first down marker, yet the latter contributes more positively to quarterback rating. Similarly, the formula doesn't distinguish between garbage time statistics accumulated in lopsided games versus production in high-leverage, competitive situations.
Another limitation is the formula's historical context. Developed in 1973, it reflected the passing environment of that era. As rule changes have increasingly favored passing offenses, rating inflation has occurred, making historical comparisons challenging. A 90.0 passer rating in 1978 represented elite performance, while the same rating in today's NFL is merely average.
Alternative Quarterback Metrics:
- ESPN's Total QBR: Includes game context, rushing value, and expected points added
- PFF Quarterback Grades: Based on play-by-play film analysis rather than just statistics
- Adjusted Net Yards Per Attempt (ANY/A): Incorporates sacks and gives appropriate weights to TDs/INTs
- Expected Points Added (EPA): Measures quarterback impact on team scoring probability
- DVOA (Defense-adjusted Value Over Average): Adjusts for opponent quality and situation
Notable Quarterback Rating Performances
Throughout NFL history, certain quarterback performances have established remarkable benchmarks in passer rating achievement. These noteworthy accomplishments demonstrate the heights of passing efficiency possible and provide context for evaluating contemporary quarterback play.
The perfect passer rating of 158.3 represents the pinnacle of quarterback efficiency. Achieving this mark requires exceptional performance across all statistical categories. Since the formula's adoption in 1973, perfect passer rating games (minimum 10 passing attempts) have occurred fewer than 75 times in regular season play—an average of less than two per season—underscoring the difficulty of achieving this statistical feat.
Single-Season Rating Leaders
| Player | Year | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Rodgers | 2011 | 122.5 |
| Peyton Manning | 2004 | 121.1 |
| Aaron Rodgers | 2020 | 121.5 |
| Tom Brady | 2007 | 117.2 |
| Patrick Mahomes | 2018 | 113.8 |
Career Progress: Selected QBs
| Player | Years 1-3 | Career | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peyton Manning | 80.0 | 96.5 | +16.5 |
| Tom Brady | 86.4 | 97.2 | +10.8 |
| Drew Brees | 76.4 | 98.7 | +22.3 |
| Patrick Mahomes | 108.9 | 105.7 | -3.2 |
Aaron Rodgers' 2011 season stands as the gold standard for sustained quarterback efficiency. During that MVP campaign, Rodgers posted a 122.5 rating while throwing 45 touchdowns against just 6 interceptions. His 9.2 yards per attempt and 68.3% completion rate exemplify how elite accuracy combined with aggressive downfield passing can produce extraordinary rating results.
Career passer rating progression often reveals quarterback development patterns. Many successful quarterbacks like Peyton Manning, Drew Brees, and Tom Brady began with modest ratings before peaking in their late 20s and early 30s as they mastered NFL defenses and refined their mechanics. In contrast, some recent quarterbacks like Patrick Mahomes and Deshaun Watson have posted elite ratings almost immediately upon entering the league, reflecting both their talent and the increasingly quarterback-friendly rules in today's game.
Rating Milestones:
- First perfect rating (minimum 20 attempts): Ken Anderson (12/17/1989)
- Most career games with perfect rating: Tom Brady, Ben Roethlisberger, Kurt Warner (4 each)
- Longest streak of games with 100+ rating: Aaron Rodgers (12 games, 2011)
- Highest rookie season rating: Dak Prescott (104.9, 2016)
- Highest postseason rating (minimum 150 attempts): Patrick Mahomes (106.1)
Strategic Applications
Beyond its value as a historical benchmark, quarterback rating serves practical purposes for coaches, analysts, and fantasy football participants. Understanding how to strategically apply this metric enhances decision-making at multiple levels of football engagement.
For NFL coaching staffs, quarterback rating components offer diagnostic insights into performance strengths and weaknesses. A quarterback with high completion percentage but low yards per attempt may need more aggressive downfield throws in the game plan. Conversely, a quarterback with good yards per attempt but poor completion percentage might benefit from more high-percentage short passes to establish rhythm. Breaking down the rating into its components helps identify specific areas for improvement.
Coaching Applications
- Identifying specific skill development needs
- Tailoring game plans to QB strengths
- Evaluating progression in practice sessions
- Making quarterback personnel decisions
- Analyzing situational performance patterns
- Comparing performance across different schemes
Fantasy Football Strategy
- Projecting consistent weekly production
- Identifying regression candidates
- Evaluating defensive matchup impacts
- Spotting breakout candidates
- Finding streaming QB options
- Assessing home/road performance splits
Team front offices use quarterback rating trends for contract valuation and draft evaluation. Multi-year rating stability indicates consistent performance worthy of financial investment, while volatility raises red flags. When scouting college quarterbacks, rating components (particularly adjusted for competition level) help project NFL potential. Teams often track private rating models that weight components differently based on their offensive philosophy.
Fantasy football managers can leverage quarterback rating data for competitive advantage. Understanding how defensive matchups historically affect opponent passer ratings helps with weekly lineup decisions. Tracking rating splits by situation—home versus away, outdoors versus dome, division versus non-division opponents—reveals patterns that standard projections might miss. Quarterback ratings in red zone situations often predict touchdown efficiency better than raw touchdown totals.
Strategic Insights:
- Quarterback ratings typically improve in home games (average +5.2 points)
- Indoor/dome environments boost passer ratings by approximately 4.8 points
- Weather impacts: Rain (-6.1), Snow (-8.7), High winds >20mph (-12.5)
- Third down passer rating predicts sustained drives better than overall rating
- Red zone passer rating correlates more strongly with scoring than overall rating
The Evolution of Quarterback Analytics
While quarterback rating remains an important statistical tool, the football analytics revolution has produced numerous advanced metrics that provide complementary perspectives on quarterback performance. This evolving landscape of quarterback evaluation reflects the game's increasing complexity and the growing sophistication of performance analysis.
ESPN's Total QBR, introduced in 2011, represents one of the most prominent alternatives to traditional passer rating. This metric incorporates critical factors that passer rating omits, including rushing contributions, sacks, fumbles, penalties, and down-and-distance context. Crucially, Total QBR weights plays based on their game situation importance—a fourth-quarter touchdown in a tied game carries more value than one in a 30-point blowout. This contextual awareness addresses many of the traditional passer rating's limitations.
Modern QB Analytics Framework
- Traditional Stats: Passer rating, completion %, TD/INT
- Efficiency Metrics: ANY/A, EPA/play, DVOA
- Advanced Composites: Total QBR, PFF grades
- Physical Metrics: Next Gen Stats (time to throw, air yards)
- Situational Analysis: 3rd down, red zone, play-action
- Stability Measures: Pressure performance, clean pocket stats
Next Gen Stats Revolution
- Completion % Over Expected: Throw difficulty model
- Aggressive Throw %: Tight window passing frequency
- Time to Throw: Processing speed measurement
- Intended Air Yards: Downfield passing aggression
- Air Yards to Sticks: Down-and-distance awareness
- Pressure Avoidance: Pocket navigation efficiency
The emergence of player tracking data through NFL Next Gen Stats has further transformed quarterback analysis. Metrics like Completion Percentage Over Expected (CPOE) compare actual completion rates to an expected baseline derived from receiver separation, throw depth, pressure, and other factors. This reveals which quarterbacks consistently complete passes that statistical models consider difficult, providing insight into true accuracy beyond raw completion percentage.
Expected Points Added (EPA) has become a cornerstone of modern quarterback evaluation. This approach calculates how each play changes the team's expected scoring potential, creating a common currency to value different plays. A quarterback's EPA per play offers a comprehensive measure of their contribution to scoring that accounts for game situation, field position, and down-and-distance—all factors traditional passer rating ignores.
Despite these advances, traditional quarterback rating remains valuable for several reasons: its historical continuity enables cross-era comparisons, its calculation requires only basic statistics available for all NFL history, and its components isolate specific passing performance aspects. Most analysts now employ quarterback rating alongside newer metrics, recognizing that each measure illuminates different facets of quarterback play.
Leading Analytics Insights:
- Clean pocket performance is more predictive of future success than pressured metrics
- Play-action passing typically boosts passer rating by 10-15 points
- First-read completion percentage correlates strongly with sustained success
- Performance from play designs vs. off-script plays reveals system dependency
- Red zone passing efficiency has higher correlation to wins than overall efficiency
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a quarterback rating?
A quarterback rating, also known as a passer rating, is a statistical measure used to evaluate the performance of quarterbacks in American football. It combines completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdown percentage, and interception percentage into a single number ranging from 0 to 158.3, with higher values indicating better performance.
How is the NFL quarterback rating calculated?
The NFL quarterback rating uses a complex formula with four steps: 1) Calculate four components: completion percentage ((completions/attempts × 100 - 30) ÷ 20), yards per attempt ((yards/attempts - 3) ÷ 4), touchdown percentage ((touchdowns/attempts × 100) ÷ 5), and interception percentage (2.375 - ((interceptions/attempts × 100) ÷ 4)). 2) Cap each component between 0 and 2.375. 3) Calculate the final rating: ((component1 + component2 + component3 + component4) ÷ 6) × 100.
What is considered a good quarterback rating in the NFL?
In the NFL, a quarterback rating above 100 is considered excellent, 85-100 is good, 70-85 is average, and below 70 is below average. The all-time career leader in NFL passer rating (minimum 1,500 attempts) is currently Patrick Mahomes with a rating over 105. A perfect passer rating of 158.3 is extremely rare and requires exceptional performance across all statistical categories.
How does the NFL quarterback rating differ from the NCAA (college) rating?
The NFL and NCAA use different rating systems. The NCAA formula is simpler and produces values on a different scale (maximum of 1,261.6), which is why college QBs often have ratings over 200. The NFL rating is capped at 158.3, uses different weighting for statistics, and adjusts each component to fit between 0 and 2.375. Meanwhile, the NCAA formula uses raw statistical ratios multiplied by different constants.
What are the limitations of the quarterback rating system?
While useful, the quarterback rating has several limitations. It doesn't account for rushing yards and touchdowns, fumbles, sacks taken, game situation context, or the quality of the opposing defense. It also doesn't consider the difficulty of throws, dropped passes, or clutch performance in critical moments. More comprehensive metrics like ESPN's QBR (Total Quarterback Rating) and PFF grades attempt to address these limitations.
Who has achieved a perfect passer rating of 158.3?
Several quarterbacks have achieved a perfect 158.3 rating in individual games, but it's rare for a full season. To achieve a perfect rating, a quarterback needs to complete at least 77.5% of passes, average at least 12.5 yards per attempt, throw a touchdown on at least 11.875% of attempts, and have zero interceptions. Notable single-game perfect ratings include performances by Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Kurt Warner, and more recently, Lamar Jackson.
What's the difference between quarterback rating and ESPN's QBR?
The traditional quarterback rating uses only basic passing statistics (completions, attempts, yards, touchdowns, and interceptions). ESPN's Total QBR is more comprehensive, accounting for game context (clutch situations, score differential), rushing statistics, penalties, sacks, fumbles, and the quality of opposing defenses. QBR is measured on a 0-100 scale, with 50 being average, while traditional passer rating has a maximum of 158.3 with no defined average value.
Tell us more, and we'll get back to you.
Contact Us